<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Intelligence Market</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.talkunafraid.co.uk/2009/07/the-intelligence-market/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.talkunafraid.co.uk/2009/07/the-intelligence-market/</link>
	<description>The (occasionally coherent) ramblings of a geek</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 22:58:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Harrison</title>
		<link>http://www.talkunafraid.co.uk/2009/07/the-intelligence-market/comment-page-1/#comment-260</link>
		<dc:creator>James Harrison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 14:34:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.talkunafraid.co.uk/?p=389#comment-260</guid>
		<description>Therein lies the problem. The only way I can see this could work is if the service uses public/private key cryptography/signing to protect the data.

For example: Spymaster Alice wants info on Alliance A&#039;s fleet composition/fittings. Spy Bob knows this info and agrees to give it to Alice.

Alice has, during signup, registered her public key with the service, and Bob uses the key to encrypt the message, after signing it with his key, which he also registered with the service.

If we assume that the operator, Eve, is trying to eavesdrop, Eve now needs both Bob and Alice&#039;s private keys in order to alter the data, or just Alice&#039;s key to read it. Eve&#039;s control over the data assuming keys are not compromised is limited to sending or not sending the data between parties.

Of course, the problem then lies in making public/private key cryptography simple enough for the average EVE player, in a way that is still secure.

I think the only way to do this would be to provide an open source client to the website that ran on a user&#039;s computer and managed the public/private key aspects (generation, signing, encryption). In fact, all the website needs to do is keep a register of users, their public keys, requests for information and responses given to that information. A small helper app that ran locally, responded to special links on the site (say I click &#039;Respond&#039; on Alice&#039;s offer; the website opens up the app and asks me to enter my response before signing and encrypting the response and POSTing it to the server), as long as the helper app is open source, would guarantee security between parties and ensure there is no eavesdropping by Eve.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Therein lies the problem. The only way I can see this could work is if the service uses public/private key cryptography/signing to protect the data.</p>
<p>For example: Spymaster Alice wants info on Alliance A&#8217;s fleet composition/fittings. Spy Bob knows this info and agrees to give it to Alice.</p>
<p>Alice has, during signup, registered her public key with the service, and Bob uses the key to encrypt the message, after signing it with his key, which he also registered with the service.</p>
<p>If we assume that the operator, Eve, is trying to eavesdrop, Eve now needs both Bob and Alice&#8217;s private keys in order to alter the data, or just Alice&#8217;s key to read it. Eve&#8217;s control over the data assuming keys are not compromised is limited to sending or not sending the data between parties.</p>
<p>Of course, the problem then lies in making public/private key cryptography simple enough for the average EVE player, in a way that is still secure.</p>
<p>I think the only way to do this would be to provide an open source client to the website that ran on a user&#8217;s computer and managed the public/private key aspects (generation, signing, encryption). In fact, all the website needs to do is keep a register of users, their public keys, requests for information and responses given to that information. A small helper app that ran locally, responded to special links on the site (say I click &#8216;Respond&#8217; on Alice&#8217;s offer; the website opens up the app and asks me to enter my response before signing and encrypting the response and POSTing it to the server), as long as the helper app is open source, would guarantee security between parties and ensure there is no eavesdropping by Eve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luteros</title>
		<link>http://www.talkunafraid.co.uk/2009/07/the-intelligence-market/comment-page-1/#comment-259</link>
		<dc:creator>Luteros</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 07:32:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.talkunafraid.co.uk/?p=389#comment-259</guid>
		<description>Good Idea, but can you trust the Market Operator? He will be the one who gets all Information and can sell or change it for his own benefit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good Idea, but can you trust the Market Operator? He will be the one who gets all Information and can sell or change it for his own benefit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Hankey</title>
		<link>http://www.talkunafraid.co.uk/2009/07/the-intelligence-market/comment-page-1/#comment-257</link>
		<dc:creator>David Hankey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 10:55:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.talkunafraid.co.uk/?p=389#comment-257</guid>
		<description>Same for mercenary contracts, it would be like C&amp;P 2.0. I leave it to you to do, my coding is rusty.

Excellent Idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Same for mercenary contracts, it would be like C&amp;P 2.0. I leave it to you to do, my coding is rusty.</p>
<p>Excellent Idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

